Jun 20 2017
Jun 19 2017
Jun 18 2017
If they need to be in a different format just let me know.
@francois, why png?
Jun 16 2017
Jun 14 2017
We could also do this:
That's not freedom issue, but could be classified as a privacy problem.
Jun 4 2017
May 30 2017
May 23 2017
May 22 2017
May 20 2017
Sure.
You need to click on a rar archive. But linguistically speaking, it doesn't »suggest« to install rar, it simply states that rar is not found.
mladen@pureos:/home/mladen/Downloads# unp ojsa.rar Error, following packages must be installed in order to proceed: rar or unrar or unrar-free
It says this:
mladen@pureos:~/Downloads$ atool -l ojsa.rar Can't exec "rar": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/atool line 1869. rar: cannot execute - No such file or directory atool: rar ...: non-zero return-code
mladen@pureos:~/Downloads$ atool -x ojsa.rar Can't exec "rar": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/atool line 1869. rar: cannot execute - No such file or directory atool: rar ...: non-zero return-code
Copyright file claims everything is under Artistic license:
Patch is already suggested:
how did other endorsed distros solve this?
FSF might find this suggesting nonfree, as some of the plugins are not useful without nonfree software (like Skype). But looking at Trisquel: they did not remove this either, so we might leave it as well.
smtube isn't removed in Trisquel (http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/smtube), and yes, it's free. But for PureOS as a privacy/security focused OS it would be better to drop this (IMHO, see again: http://tonvid.com/privacy-policy.php). Besides, smplayer already can play YouTube videos by default (by using mpv as a backend).
You are right, it's free. Explanation:
Yes, it's just acetoneiso, but FSF will definitely consider this as a nonfree:
Files: debian/examples/crontab2english.pl
Copyright: 2001, Sean M. Burke
License: Artistic
Is GeoGebra free and open source software?
GeoGebra is open source software and available free of charge for non-commercial users.
...
Please note that GeoGebra as a complete software program would probably not be considered "free" software according to the definition of that term which is used by the Free Software Foundation.