Software has "launch" and "remove" listed as options so it reports that it is installed.

I'm seeing the same issue.

Can you clarify what you mean by "Software reports that" and exactly what happens when you attempt to run it from the terminal? (ideally eg. pastebin the output, screenshots, etc.)

That's very curious. Could it, perhaps, be trying to access the internet? I wonder if this was doing it in a GUI thread previously and (now) no longer, so the underling problem remains but the symptoms have simply moved around.

Software reports that gdebi is installed but will not launch. It is not in the menu nor does it launch from terminal. Uninstall and reinstall from software produces the same result.

Full update of PureOS 8 as of today 01-08-18.

I see the latest gnome-pomodoro has a fix regarding gnome-shell segfaults:

Confirmed with da3762b113acc39c81d6ba8a8903054ab40d3858 pureos-8.0-live-amd64.hybrid.iso

Thanks @krisgesling. Let me know either way.

I ran MemTest86 v7.4 through the default 4 tests and it returned no errors.

Resolved in the 2018-01-06 images.

Thank you for alerting me. SHA512 is what is current for canaries.

This should be assigned to somebody else :)

Should probably go to Zlatan, or maybe Kyle.

Assigning to you, @chris.lamb since you did the previous packaging work, and you use a different packaging style regarding git.

@krisgesling If it's doing this after watching video for a while, this might be the case. Otherwise it's likely some kind of BIOS/video card/blah interaction. Can you speak to the timings here? It could also be faulty RAM, etc. etc. :)

It's a Librem 15v2.

@krisgesling This sounds like a lower-level issue, either in your graphics driver or there is a problem with your hardware. (Given you are playing video, it could be overheating, just as one example.) Can you briefly outline your hardware? Thanks.

Trisquel is also affected: https://trisquel.info/en/issues/23629

Short answer, I was wrong...

@krisgesling Can you elaborate why Nautilus would be the culprit here?

I changed the Antialiasing in Gnome Tweak > Fonts to Standard, it it looked the way it's supposed to.

So my other ISO which I thought that was November might be from earlier - it has a non-November timestamp on my filesystem, but I have idea whether I can trust that hence giving you the SHAs in a few messages back.

Hmm, the November image should work (from 2017-11-11) and only the December images should have this issue... But maybe I overlooked something there.
This issue should be resolved soon.

Was on this today. Looks like we'll need dbus-cpp (nb. not dbus-c++!) that is not currently in sid..

I actually warned about this issue, so people would not link to the December image from our download page

I actually warned about this issue, so people would not link to the December image from our download page, as I haven't had the time to fix the problem during that month...
Oh well...

I initially reported this for pureos-8.0-live-amd64.hybrid.iso with a SHA1 of
021d002fe8f7fdf2ba4d53a40d297069ef0a811d

Sorry for the late reply. Happy new year!

Hi QiZhi,

Just had two logouts in a row pairing with consecutive gnome-shell-pomodoro notifications a few minutes apart.

I have uninstalled Slack at Mladen's suggestion. I will see if that helps matters.

I'm rep on Keybase. I have a core dump file I found in my home directory that I can share with someone if I know what key to encrypt it to.

The segfault at Dec 28 16:13:00 happened at the same second when someone responded to me from Slack, which I had minimized.

Based on francois' findings this seems to be an issue with Thinderbird, not PureBrowser.

ie. the installer is entirely broken unless you, somehow, don't need any kernel modules whatsoever!

Possibly this issue is bogus: When _switching_ from on to off it makes sense to make one final "leak" to request deletion of previously collected "leaks".

This issue is about the choice of search _engine_ - i.e. where requests typed into the search field end when hitting return.

Thanks for sharing!

pip already came up with a decision. see the link above.

Again I see that you are not able to read.

You continue to discuss matters I have explicitly told you is outside the scope of this issue.

I guess you are not able to read.
Every single native packager for any single scripting language or other package system does allow installation of nonfree packages according to your terms, and would be thus as such banned from PureOS. Many of them already agreed to add a license meta field to their databases. So they are not hostile. You are the one who started the hostility against them.

I agree with you that (to the best of my knowledge) cpanm has no way of knowing the licensing of a CPAN module, and therefore cannot be instructed (by default or patched specifically for PureOS) to consider only modules that fits the licensing regime imposed on PureOS. This is the reason I see no other solution than to avoid cpanm in PureOS.

Uhm, it seems you are reading something between the lines here that I did not write.

So why are wanting to ban cpanm, and not the official client cpan out of the blue? You are acting completely irresponsible.

Yes, it makes good sense to report issues upstream - but only sometimes not always, and not as a prerequisite for filing issues here (if that is what you mean by "at least").

I don't understand all details of what you write, so will comment only on the parts I understand.

"A free system distribution must not steer users towards obtaining any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so. The system should have no repositories for nonfree software and no specific recipes for installation of particular nonfree programs. Nor should the distribution refer to third-party repositories that are not committed to only including free software; even if they only have free software today, that may not be true tomorrow. Programs in the system should not suggest installing nonfree plugins, documentation, and so on"

Thanks for your information.

It's actually easy to identify which apps were installed, because I tested this issue with a default installation of all operating systems mentioned, the only extra package being installed was the Atom package itself (along with its dependencies).

Thanks for (vaguely) hinting at what to look for in the screenshot. That is helpful.

I have not found any other application with this same issue in PureOS, which is why I created a bug report for the Atom text editor specifically. I thought it appropriate to put the bug here, because it only happens in PureOS (not in Debian Stretch, Debian Testing, Linux Mint, or Trisquel 7/8), so I think it must be specific to something unique to PureOS.