@tbernard I suggest you repeat your question to ensure that the others tracking the original bug which this is a duplicate/mirror of hears it. You might also want to read the backlog, as they might have already answered your question ;-)

That is quite likely part of "Activity Stream" which has been removed in PureBrowser, compared to Firefox ESR: See T534

From a user experience POV it would be better to not be bothered like this.

What we do different with Firefox is _remove_ some functionality that Mozilla ships by default and then also force-include some WebExtensions which Debian ship as well but do offer for their users to freely decide if they want part of their Firefox experience.

Thanks for those new details.

It was a wild guess at what might cause the issue at the _host_ side which is not PureOS.

@jeremiah.foster It does not make sense to me why/how this bug is closed.

For the record (as I understand time's up for your concrete case), use of Logical Volume Management (LVM) can provide a user experience of a single "virtual" partition, stitched together from multiple underlying physical "volume" partitions.

well, in my splitting-hairs mode it is factually alarming: It set off an alarm, of the cenventional blinkenlight type.

I believe it is only the install routines for PureOS that has problems with EFI, the installed PureOS works fine with EFI.

@jeremiah.foster I recommend to put as issue subject the issue (not its solution), and not rename to its solution when closed either: Example: References will then sensibly show the _problem_ as striked out, not confusingly that the solution is striked out.

You were told that this is a pristine live image, or you are guessing?

Yes, PureOS is a general purpose operating system, it is possible to install things on it that attempts to contact a certain IP number every time it boots.

Seems to me that problems running PureOS in an emulator is an issue with that emulator.
I can suggest that you try raise this as an issue in Ubuntu.
A wild guess could be that you use some non-free graphics driver (e.g. for NVIDIA hardware) which might work great for some things but have issues with other things.

This was reported in Debian recently: http://bugs.debian.org/921030

(hm, not really resolved, but seems that's the option we got in this interface)

Thanks for trying, @jgn2112

@jeremiah.foster Better to merge new issue into older - especially when the older is referenced from other places as is the case here.

Thanks for clarifying, @jeremiah.foster - I hope the current title is suitable.

@jeremiah.foster please elaborate on your title change - is this issue not about _continuously_ updating at a faster _pace_ but only about getting some specific new version?!?

How is this issue different from T11?

Thanks for mentioning, @guido - I had missed T594 now linked here.

Tracking fast-changing packages in particular need strong monitoring e.g. by somthing like security-tracker.debian.org.

I find that expressing tickets as what is wrong helps.

@jeremiah.foster: No, this ticket is explicitly about the functionality, not branding of it!

Seems you are on the right track in that the error message indicates FileZilla is requesting a feature unavailable in GnuTLS. The exact cause for you may not be same as the one addressed in the bugreorts you found - they might just be for similar kinds of issues.

This is not (by our definition) a freedom issue: It does not involve installing non-free software locally.

This is not a freedom issue (by our definition), since it does not involve installing non-free software locally.

This is not a freedom issue, since it does not involve installing non-free software locally.

This is not a freedom issue, since it does not involve installing non-free software locally.

@mak ping!

@mak ping!

@mak ping!

Please drop forked package now, @mak

@mak ping!

@mak Ping!

This issue seems possibly related to an issue in LibreOffice resolved today in debian (and thus not yet in PureOS) by tightening its dependency on apparmor: https://bugs.debian.org/918499

@mak Please have a look at this - smells AppStream-related.

I suspect that the line with UbuntuDrivers is totally unrelated and just a warning (despite the confusingly misleading initial word in captial letters).

@jeremiah.foster does it spew anything _after_ that error message about UbuntuDrivers?

ah - sorry, @EchedeyLR: Seems my window didn't refresh properly so I missed your latest response above. Thanks!

(me awaits responses from both @jeremiah.foster and @EchedeyLR for clarification, but suspects this issue is totally unrelated to that "UbuntuDrivers" message and instead the issue relates to AppStream...)

@EchedeyLR What is the output of this command:

@jeremiah.foster: Do you experience same issue, or do you talk about GNOME Applications because the stacktrace in the error message hints about it being tied to software-properties-gtk?

Sorry, I put it on task's name but not into description.

...or @jeremiah.foster maybe you can clue me in here: What is "this particular piece of software" that you are talking about? Perhaps I am missing something obvoius here, but I am totally clueless right now :-/

Sorry, I don't follow: which applications are we talking about here?

reporting bugs is not an accurate science - it is highly appreciated that you filed a report when only suspecting a potential issue here, @Wayne !

@Wayne yes I meant to suggest that you file an issue (here on tracker.debian.net, not in the forum) about our forum triggering warnings about fingerprinting.

Thanks for those details, @Wayne!

DuckDuckGo is no longer privacy-protecting: https://forums.whonix.org/t/duckduckgo-now-fingerprinting-visitors/6497/1