Can you try again? I cannot reproduce this issue on Byzantium.

gnome-control-center is updated: https://software.pureos.net/package/src/byzantium/gnome-control-center

Do you know what model your Wifi adapter is? It may require proprietary drivers to function which we do not include in PureOS.

An administrator has to remove accounts from the command line. Alternatively, an admin can "disable" your account which stops mail and your ability to login - is this sufficient or would you like the information permanently deleted?

This points to file corruption I think. It appears that people have had success in deleting files in

/var/lib/apt/lists/

and re-running apt.

Can one install PureOS wihout a monitor and mouse? I.e. using only a keyboard.

Fascinating. I believe this is a bug in GNOME. I'll see if there is a suitable place for it upstream.

Is this a duplicate for #T935?

There are parts of the EFI stack that are proprietary, this is why we do not include them in our installer. Other projects may include them in their "non-free" repos but because we're a FSF compliant Free Software distro we don't include non-free repositories. We continue to investigate if there is a way to support GPT.

Run cpu-x. Get this message;

Is this in Amber, or Byzantium? (/etc/os-release should have this info.)

I think that this might be an "okay" situation as it is. The point is that adding deb-src repos is more of a power user thing, no?

Will do. Thanks for keeping it such good shape Jonas. :-)

Is there any relevant dmesg output? Can you monitor the kernel ring buffer with dmesg -w?

I can't reproduce this. I just installed apt-listchanges in Byzantium

@adaian What happens when you turn on the computer? What do you see? Can you write down any messages that the screen shows? The term 'brick' doesn't describe very much unfortunately. Do you have a USB device you can burn a live ISO to and boot from?

I'm getting a "page not found" for the depcheck byzantium issue.

It looks like you're using the Sonic mirror.

We no longer are going to maintain Purebrowser given upstream lack of support.

Is this on reboot?

I can't reproduce;

I can't reproduce;

$ sudo apt install gnome-contacts

Which device is this @francois?

My python version is;

I did;

Thanks for the update @alexngould

I'm not sure - it looks like they do have a signed release file here: https://mirrors.sonic.net/pureos/repo/pureos/dists/byzantium/

You can try the main repos;

Exciting - we should test this in Byzantium and hopefully we can close this bug.

If you follow the upstream discussion you can see that they're already on it! :-)

Debian maintainer states "I'm concerned that the addition of vendor_id might cause an ABI break. There are multiple packages that use libnitrokey in Debian (not just nitrokey-app) and so we can't silently change the ABI."

I've pulled down the Debian packaging from Salsa and reused that. I've added in the patches from upstream and built package for PureOS Amber and Byzantium.

Looks like this is the diff;

Matthias is looking upstream to see if the fix has been already made in effort to de-duplicate work.

Has the PoC been tested with the app?

So, if I understand correctly, this repo holds the patched libnitrokey: https://source.puri.sm/joao.azevedo/libnitrokey/

Thanks @selea.

I'm happy to work on this TODAY but this is not "Unbreak Now!" because it is not breaking anything for our users and, we have a perfectly viable alternative that is a tiny bit better, namely the Librem Key.

@hansolo Yes, thank you! What I hope to do is to determine that any action we take affects only the Librems with a US keyboard. We're going to have to determine the best fix for the US keyboard and then deploy.

@mak Do you have a German keyboard now? Or is your L13 v4 US keyboard?

I'm going turn this task into a milestone so we can track the release period.

Both those mentions in the logs at boot time are "normal".

Apparently an upstream bug: https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/12401

Thanks for reporting!

The versions in Amber and Byzantium are not far apart; https://software.pureos.net/search_pkg?term=libccid
In Debian's Salsa it appears they're about 88 commits apart: https://salsa.debian.org/rousseau/CCID/-/compare/ccid-1.4.30...ccid-1.4.32