Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

Fixed.

can you check more about this source - there are quite a bit of apple README and code files there, maybe we can remove them all?

Fixed.

Fixed and uploaded to landing.

Fixed.

Sure.

funny thing here is that it has no nonfree fonts at all (it uses Liberation fonts that replace nonfree MS fonts). We will see to do the same maybe as parabola but I think this should be reported to upstream as it is just naming thing, no real nonfree code anywhere. @mladen.pejakovic care to forward this to upstream?

I'll patch this one today.

closing, it is all free, we can't stop people of downloading rar archives and trying mc commander on it.

nope, it doesn't. Closing.

You need to click on a rar archive. But linguistically speaking, it doesn't »suggest« to install rar, it simply states that rar is not found.

I'll patch this one today.

how, when, where - I installed it and run it and nothing popped on me.

@mladen.pejakovic apt show only shows unrar in suggests. Is this in app recommendation, if so, screenshot please :)

I'll patch this one today.

It says this:

I'll patch this one today.

I'll patch this one out.

I'll patch this one today.

@mladen.pejakovic apt show mc doesn't agree with that. Does the app itself suggest that during usage?

I'll patch this one day.

ah that is easy one, just commenting lines (actually most of those gui suggestion will be solved by commenting lines). I'll see to patch this out today as well.

Copyright file claims everything is under Artistic license:

unace is free software (we closed that bug right?). Can you show screenshot for the asking part?

Patch is already suggested:

how did other endorsed distros solve this?

this is not part of any dependency chain, so before I drop into source code of it, can you provide me some screenshots about that issue @mladen.pejakovic

I'll patch this today.

I'll look into it today, all those dependencies are part of suggest (and we can just patch the source if it shows asking for it or is problematic for endorsement). @mladen.pejakovic how did other endorsed distros solve this?

do parts of it use it or entire doc is on that licenses without the GPL dual license part?

It is free software, plugins are free software, other endorsed distro has it, closing. Feel free to re-open if the need arises.

@zlatan.todoric I'm afraid not, look:

I'll patch this today.

FSF might find this suggesting nonfree, as some of the plugins are not useful without nonfree software (like Skype). But looking at Trisquel: they did not remove this either, so we might leave it as well.

@mak just drop this one and close the bug.

Indeed, I will take this into consideration and into company debate.

@mladen.pejakovic if I remove entire range of Suggests, I think that should be sufficient to keep it in archive, right?

@mak while maybe it could be patched through hoops of things (and maybe ends up being useful one day for free nvidia driver), now, just drop those packages and close the bug.

Thanks, I'll patch it.

smtube isn't removed in Trisquel (http://packages.trisquel.info/belenos/smtube), and yes, it's free. But for PureOS as a privacy/security focused OS it would be better to drop this (IMHO, see again: http://tonvid.com/privacy-policy.php). Besides, smplayer already can play YouTube videos by default (by using mpv as a backend).

This is a think that just would cripple and not benefit anyone. smtube is free software. The service it is using is probably nonfree but than again would browser be considered nonfree because we can access YouTube with it? @mladen.pejakovic just point again to FSF list if this is considered by them nonfree as I think this would actually require a debate as software in usage here is free software

You are right, it's free. Explanation:

Yes, it's just acetoneiso, but FSF will definitely consider this as a nonfree:

Files: debian/examples/crontab2english.pl
Copyright: 2001, Sean M. Burke
License: Artistic

Is GeoGebra free and open source software?
GeoGebra is open source software and available free of charge for non-commercial users.
...
Please note that GeoGebra as a complete software program would probably not be considered "free" software according to the definition of that term which is used by the Free Software Foundation.

bumblebee is free software (bumblebee-nvidia is not but we don't have and I patched bumblebee to not have it). primus is also free software unless proven otherwise.

@mladen.pejakovic Can you point to which one? Package in its build and depends per se doesn't have any nonfree dependency afaics, but it does have in plugin repo (once installed and you run the app and go to preferences) gmail and twitter plugis but afaik they are still free plugins (albeit to nonfree services but than that would render nonfree everything that can connect to internet and any nonfree service, website etc - first on attack would be browsers here). Also FSF reference to ti would be nice if there is one.

@mladen.pejakovic can you give me some FSF text that points to this issue because:

@mladen.pejakovic why is this package tagged as nonfree? It is in Debian main so it is in PureOS main as well and it only depends on libc6.

@mak how do you feel about this one. I don't feel easy to take and patch but maybe some users want chromium thus we would need to package iridium which again is not something I feel happy about it. I think dropping it will not create big issue in archive as chromium is pretty much self-contained but again, I am wondering how users would feel about it (or should we take it as granted that purebrowser is awesome and there is still epiphany, midori etc)?

Patched, should be fixed and sync'ed in PureOS in next 12 hours.

Hm, I don't see acetoniso2 in archive and acetoniso didn't ask me anything nor do I see it depends on poweriso and unrar-nonfree (the nonfree things aren't even part of the archive). Can you recheck @mladen.pejakovic ?

@mladen.pejakovic I grep'ed the file and no license shows there, can you check where I could see license for it or maybe Debian patched this already?