Code has practical use only with nonfree code available.
FSF guidelines for systems forbids to "steer users towards obtaining any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so."
Code has practical use only with nonfree code available.
FSF guidelines for systems forbids to "steer users towards obtaining any nonfree information for practical use, or encourage them to do so."
This is an issue in Debian but not in PureOS, because PureOS offers no nonfree packages.
This is an issue in Debian but not in PureOS, because PureOS offers no nonfree packages.
This issue is bogus for PureOS, because PureOS provide no non-free packages.
This issue is bogus - even if package is reintroduced into PureOS: libxnvctrl does _not_ need nor promote non-free software (see T64).
This issue is bogus: libxnvctrl does _not_ need nor promote free software (see T64).
This issue is bogus: libxnvctrl does _not_ need nor promote free software (see T64).
This issue is bogus: libxnvctrl does _not_ need nor promote free software (see T64).
This issue is bogus: libxnvctrl does _not_ need nor promote free software (see T64).
I have come to same conclusion as you, @mak, that this is no Freedom issue, and too painful without any real gain to try solve.
Chromium is blocked from entering PureOS.
Will remove the following packages from landing:
package released avoiding shared libxnvctrl - but several copies of same library is embedded with source and still used.
@mak please block libxnvctrl when pending qtwebengine-opensource-src is approved.
Fixed package entered green.
Fixed package has entered green.
Fixed package now in green.