- User Since
- Jul 26 2021, 02:53 (7 w, 5 d)
Fri, Aug 20
Hmm, okay - I've just checked my little local CentOS server and indeed, it doesn't have a gpg.conf (or any conf) under ~/.gnupg. My apologies.
Aug 19 2021
No, that is not the issue here. The issue here is:
So, if PureOS insists on being unusual, the question becomes - why is PureOS unusual in this particular way?
Phew, this file exists on the gnupg implementation in Debian, CentOS and Fedora, at least - those are all fairly standard implementations of gnu/linux (although arguable implementations of two standards).
man gpg says:
Aug 11 2021
I'm not sure I understand the relevance of the answer to the question?
The question was: why are the defaults not reflected here:
~/.gnupg/gpg.conf (as per man gpg) as I would expect and are on my Debian 10 install
~/.gnupg/dirmngr.conf (as suggested here)
Those aren't 'system-wide' locations.