Package doublecmd-common suggests nonfree package libunrar, and mentions this in several long descriptions.
Parabola patch removes "Support for RAR archives can be enabled by installing the libunrar0 package from non-free." from the description.
Description
Description
| Status | Assigned | Task | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open | None | T367 PureOS is not fully in sync with Debian | ||
| Invalid | mak | T82 doublecmd-common: suggests nonfree package libunrar0 (and mentions this in several package descriptions) |
Event Timeline
Comment Actions
Possibly libunrar0 is nonfree in some other universe (or in ancient times?), but it is non-existent in PureOS as well as (contemporary at least) Debian.
Comment Actions
doublecmd does not suggest a non-free package, only a non-existent one.
Package descriptions also include only bogus hints (PureOS has no suite called "non-free").
@mak Please drop our fork of doublecmd and let in the Debian package which complies fine with GNU FSDG.
When addressed, this issue should be flaged as "invalid" (not "resolved").